<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moderate Voice - Latest Comments in &amp;#8216;A Loo Shook The Art World&amp;#8230;And Changed The Face Of Art&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/8216a_loo_shook_the_art_world8230and_changed_the_face_of_art8217/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:50:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;A Loo Shook The Art World&amp;#8230;And Changed The Face Of Art&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/places/europe/united-kingdom/britain/17902/a-loo-shook-the-art-worldand-changed-the-face-of-art/#comment-163867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, Duchamp was more in the Andy Warhol vein. His aim was to skewer the pretense he saw in Cubism and other -isms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But he played it straight, and still fools folk to this day.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cosmoetica</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:50:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>