DISQUS

saintixe56 · 1 year ago

The far side of enough for wont of a better word. Or another this woman ghas no shame. So now when a thief will commit a crime, I suggest we call it a technicality; because rules and agreements are made to be no more acceptable depending on which side of the law one is.
GO AHEAD MAKE MY DAY§
CHEAT LIE, STEAL, (KILL ?)
ALL IS A TECHNICALITY
BECAUSE BETWEEN YOU AND I THAT IS HOW IT DOES LOOK. to anyone who until now thought-silly me, that once you had pledge your word, once the rules and laws have been set, you-stupid old me, you obey them rules.
HRC rewrites history...Some people wrote that some democrats were saying under cover they had had enough of the Clintons, now we all know why.
The good people of Iowa liek mysef-Hawkeye rules. will remember this. If that stupid DNC accepts to have thge FL/mi

saintixe56 · 1 year ago

The far side of enough for wont of a better word. Or another this woman ghas no shame. So now when a thief will commit a crime, I suggest we call it a technicality; because rules and agreements are made to be no more acceptable depending on which side of the law one is.
GO AHEAD MAKE MY DAY§
CHEAT LIE, STEAL, (KILL ?)
ALL IS A TECHNICALITY
BECAUSE BETWEEN YOU AND I THAT IS HOW IT DOES LOOK. to anyone who until now thought-silly me, that once you had pledge your word, once the rules and laws have been set, you-stupid old me, you obey them rules.
HRC rewrites history...Some people wrote that some democrats were saying under cover they had had enough of the Clintons, now we all know why.
The good people of Iowa liek mysef-Hawkeye rules. will remember this. If that stupid DNC accepts to have thge FL/mi

saintixe56 · 1 year ago

The far side of enough for wont of a better word. Or another this woman ghas no shame. So now when a thief will commit a crime, I suggest we call it a technicality; because rules and agreements are made to be no more acceptable depending on which side of the law one is.
GO AHEAD MAKE MY DAY§
CHEAT LIE, STEAL, (KILL ?)
ALL IS A TECHNICALITY
BECAUSE BETWEEN YOU AND I THAT IS HOW IT DOES LOOK. to anyone who until now thought-silly me, that once you had pledge your word, once the rules and laws have been set, you-stupid old me, you obey them rules.
HRC rewrites history...Some people wrote that some democrats were saying under cover they had had enough of the Clintons, now we all know why.
The good people of Iowa liek mysef-Hawkeye rules. will remember this. If that stupid DNC accepts to have thge FL/mi

saintixe56 · 1 year ago

If that stupid DNC accepts to have the FL/MI to be sitted withiout inasmuch as a blink while counrty bumpkin Iowa who -*how stupid one can be- played by the book, aside the fact the DEms are in a a sad and well, very well very sound beating in the GE, many of us, white midwesterners; and westerners, and AA will remember at the next house election who to forget to vote for. There is a thing about racism, there is a thing about sexism but mote tahn anything there is a thing about fiddling with democraty. The Pantsuit and I am a woman may be the nominee but I assure her a ride she will not forget , a ride that will be a lession to any future candidate who foolishly wants to play sleazy with my ballott.
Hear me Howard, dont you dare. Ever.

Tully · 1 year ago

From the sublime to the ridiculous.

If the "offense" occured at all, then the use or non-use of the vote by the party does not actually affect guilt in the least. The threat itself is the crime, not the followthrough or lack thereof.

I do love a circus.

mlhradio · 1 year ago

Frankly, about the ONLY thing that could get the superdelegates (those declared and undeclared) to move quickly en-masse to Obama would be if Clinton would push the "I'll take this to the convention" issue.

It's the one and only thing that the bigwigs in the Democratic party absolutely do NOT want. If the first week of June rolls around and Clinton is still raising a big stink about Florida and Michigan after the RBC meeting, I hope there is a quick and swift movement of delegates to Obama (both the remaining undeclared supers as well as previously-declared ones switching). She's sort of like the houseguest still sticking around after you've turned off the lights, switched off the electricity, sold the house and moved to another country.

daveinboca · 1 year ago

Hilarious. Don't take it to the Convention, as Teddy did in '80 when he was SEVEN HUNDRED delegates behind! And don't have a convention floor vote on whether FL or MI counts, as happened with a MS delegation long ago. Mississippi is so much more important than Florida or Michigan in the large scheme of things!

Actually, the superdelegates don't vote until the Convention convenes. Their "commitments" are worth the PR spin they generate. If Hillary concedes before forcing a decision on two large states, she's leaving a lot of money on the table.

I don't think she should pay much attention to the MSM flimflammery going on. They just go for the most liberal candidate, and she should push her CENTRIST cred because despite the media's proclamation that voters want "change," they may want it in digestible doses.

DLS · 1 year ago

"It's the one and only thing that the bigwigs in the Democratic party absolutely do NOT want."

"Hilarious. Don't take it to the Convention, as Teddy did in '80 when he was SEVEN HUNDRED delegates behind! And don't have a convention floor vote on whether FL or MI counts, as happened with a MS delegation long ago. Mississippi is so much more important than Florida or Michigan in the large scheme of things!"

The Dems really are making this hilarious by not wanting their convention to actually mean something, and merit Americans' attention, for once in a generation or longer.

DLS · 1 year ago

The Dems are the rules-don't-matter, laws-don't-matter party, and it's likely some kind of "compromise" [scowl] will be made allowing the outlaws to be seated at the convention, not so much because of the number of delegates at stake (when the states chose to violate the rules, they forfeited the seating of their delegates; any complaints by them are nonsense) but because the Dems will fear the great displeasure of voteres in those two megastates.

As if they're going to all stay home or move en masse to McCain! Riiiiiiiiiight.