<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moderate Voice - Latest Comments in David Boies on Gay Marriage and the Constitution</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/david_boies_on_gay_marriage_and_the_constitution/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:23:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: David Boies on Gay Marriage and the Constitution</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/40065/david-boies-on-gay-marriage-and-the-constitution/#comment-1653132495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Wonder how the left will deal with that ?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheer it when it&amp;amp;#39s evident, as it is here, and then be disappointed when the inevitable slide back into right-wing BS occurs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While there is nothing new here, at least to anyone who has been paying attention to the issue of marriage rights, it&amp;amp;#39s great to see it coming from a traditionally right-leaning source, and therefore reaching right-leaning people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">roro80</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:23:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Boies on Gay Marriage and the Constitution</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/40065/david-boies-on-gay-marriage-and-the-constitution/#comment-1653132493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WSJ is trying to break free of social conservatism ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonlee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:58:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Boies on Gay Marriage and the Constitution</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/40065/david-boies-on-gay-marriage-and-the-constitution/#comment-13002485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Wonder how the left will deal with that ?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheer it when it's evident, as it is here, and then be disappointed when the inevitable slide back into right-wing BS occurs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While there is nothing new here, at least to anyone who has been paying attention to the issue of marriage rights, it's great to see it coming from a traditionally right-leaning source, and therefore reaching right-leaning people. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">roro80</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:23:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Boies on Gay Marriage and the Constitution</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/40065/david-boies-on-gay-marriage-and-the-constitution/#comment-12998401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WSJ is trying to break free of social conservatism ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonlee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:58:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Boies on Gay Marriage and the Constitution</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/40065/david-boies-on-gay-marriage-and-the-constitution/#comment-1653132492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the WSJ was a right wing rag ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet they stand up for justice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wonder how the left will deal with that ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick E</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:58:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Boies on Gay Marriage and the Constitution</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/40065/david-boies-on-gay-marriage-and-the-constitution/#comment-12984796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the WSJ was a right wing rag ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet they stand up for justice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wonder how the left will deal with that ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">troosvelt_1858</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:58:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>