<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moderate Voice - Latest Comments in Dumb Web 2.0 names. And Windows 7.</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/dumb_web_20_names_and_windows_7/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:42:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dumb Web 2.0 names. And Windows 7.</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/media/internet/23458/dumb-web-20-names-and-windows-7/#comment-3050313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RX-7.  400,000 miles of fun, fun, fun.  Definitely no need for any gimmicky additions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DLS</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:42:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dumb Web 2.0 names. And Windows 7.</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/media/internet/23458/dumb-web-20-names-and-windows-7/#comment-3047208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh man, some of those domain names are just priceless. And I agree, Windows XP was the only good Windows release name (and IMO the only decent Windows OS ever...)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd much rather they put thought, effort and redirect marketing &amp;amp; ad dollars into the actual development of their OS though, rather than the name. After all, all of the really expensive cars don't have gimmicky names, just numbers and letters! That's how you know it's good, right? ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lotusflwr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:20:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>