<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moderate Voice - Latest Comments in Election Update</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/election_update/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:04:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Election Update</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/23119/election-update/#comment-2819646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;testing&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">superdestroyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:04:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Election Update</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/23119/election-update/#comment-2799095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the two interesting question is what will happen is the Democrats get to 60 seats with and without Lieberman.  Will the Democrats suck up to lieberman if he is required to keep 60 seats?  Will the Democrats kick Lieberman out of their caucus if they can get 60 seats without him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, if the Democrats get to 59, will they offer a chairmanship to someone like Collins or Snowe to get to 60 seats?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, how will the media frame the story if the Democrats get to 60 seats and the Republicans become irrelevant to politics? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">superdestroyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>