<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moderate Voice - Latest Comments in Fatwa 2&amp;#8230; NOW: Iranian Ayatollah Montazeri Issues Fatwa Against Amahdinajad and Regime</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/fatwa_28230_now_iranian_ayatollah_montazeri_issues_fatwa_against_amahdinajad_and_regime/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:41:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Fatwa 2&amp;#8230; NOW: Iranian Ayatollah Montazeri Issues Fatwa Against Amahdinajad and Regime</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39016/fatwa-2-now-iranian-ayatollah-montazeri-issues-fatwa-against-amahdinajad-and-regime/#comment-1653131206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WOW, I&amp;amp;#39m impressed ............long live democracy in Iran!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for this.................though if what you meant to do was to highlight the difference in fatwas, well is that not as it should be?   One fatwa being against an "outsider" (one raised in a western country) addressing deep aspects of the Koran, and the other directed at the country and the leader of the country?  Did we not soften it a little............like when I hear from Bush apologists, saying, "but he meant well."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">spirasol</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:41:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fatwa 2&amp;#8230; NOW: Iranian Ayatollah Montazeri Issues Fatwa Against Amahdinajad and Regime</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39016/fatwa-2-now-iranian-ayatollah-montazeri-issues-fatwa-against-amahdinajad-and-regime/#comment-12566163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WOW, I'm impressed ............long live democracy in Iran!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this.................though if what you meant to do was to highlight the difference in fatwas, well is that not as it should be?   One fatwa being against an "outsider" (one raised in a western country) addressing deep aspects of the Koran, and the other directed at the country and the leader of the country?  Did we not soften it a little............like when I hear from Bush apologists, saying, "but he meant well."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">spirasol</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:41:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>