<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moderate Voice - Latest Comments in Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/federal_deficit_tops_1_trillion_for_the_first_time_ever/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:24:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will Barack the Great prove his words and make the federal deficit of US head down? Moreover, will he be able to half it till his first term in office is over? &lt;a href="http://www.votetheday.com/americas-20/us-federal-deficit-halved-by-the-end-of-obamas-first-term-in-office-441/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.votetheday.com/americas-20/us-federal-deficit-halved-by-the-end-of-obamas-first-term-in-office-441/"&gt;http://www.votetheday.com/americas-20/us-federa...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VoteTheDay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:24:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12928659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will Barack the Great prove his words and make the federal deficit of US head down? Moreover, will he be able to half it till his first term in office is over? &lt;a href="http://www.votetheday.com/americas-20/us-federal-deficit-halved-by-the-end-of-obamas-first-term-in-office-441/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.votetheday.com/americas-20/us-federal-deficit-halved-by-the-end-of-obamas-first-term-in-office-441/"&gt;http://www.votetheday.com/a...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VoteTheDay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:24:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will let the great leader complete four Friedman units in office before making a definite judgment, until then I will give him the benefit of the doubt...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So far I am not impressed, but for totally different reasons than yours.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Quijote</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:45:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12665567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will let the great leader complete four Friedman units in office before making a definite judgment, until then I will give him the benefit of the doubt...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So far I am not impressed, but for totally different reasons than yours.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Quijote</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:45:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quadrillon&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NRafter530</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:06:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Considering none of his glorious programs have come to fruition yet...no, they have nothing to do with the financial problems...get back me in 2013.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NRafter530</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:03:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DQ -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, The Messiah and His Glorious Programs have nothing to do with the financial problems. It is The Great Satan BushCheney still at work, corrupting the Good Works for His People, who in his Benevolence, He is trying to save.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Great Leader is working diligently for you, fighting the Evil Capitalists who exploit His People. He brings only Good News and Tidings; his enemies bring only destruction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All hail the God-King Obama!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw - We are still running under last year&amp;amp;#39s budget, so nothing has changed vis-a-vis how the war effort is being funded, or its impact on the budget, so the whole argument is a red herring.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:18:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12641705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quadrillon &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NRafter530</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:06:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12641590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Considering none of his glorious programs have come to fruition yet...no, they have nothing to do with the financial problems...get back me in 2013.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NRafter530</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:03:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131334</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;BS. The war is winding down (supposedly), and why would it suddenly cost SO much more?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&amp;amp;#39s not costing more, it&amp;amp;#39s just that this year it is not ab off-budget item...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://usliberals.about.com/od/homelandsecurit1/a/IraqNumbers.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://usliberals.about.com/od/homelandsecurit1/a/IraqNumbers.htm"&gt;Iraq War Facts, Results &amp;amp; Statistics at June 24, 2009&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;U.S. SPENDING IN IRAQ&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spent &amp;amp; Approved War-Spending - About $800 billion of US taxpayers&amp;amp;#39 funds spent or approved for spending through mid-2009, including $76 billion requested by President Obama and approved by the House.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;U.S. Monthly Spending in Iraq - $12 billion in 2008&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;U.S. Spending per Second - $5,000 in 2008 (per Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on May 5, 2008)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cost of deploying one U.S. soldier for one year in Iraq - $390,000 (Congressional Research Service)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lost &amp;amp; Unaccounted for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers&amp;amp;#39 money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractors. Also, per ABC News, 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47 rifles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Missing - $1 billion in tractor trailers, tank recovery vehicles, machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and other equipment and services provided to the Iraqi security forces. (Per CBS News on Dec 6, 2007.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mismanaged &amp;amp; Wasted in Iraq - $10 billion, per Feb 2007 Congressional hearings&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Halliburton Overcharges Classified by the Pentagon as Unreasonable and Unsupported - $1.4 billion&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Amount paid to KBR, a former Halliburton division, to supply U.S. military in Iraq with food, fuel, housing and other items - $20 billion&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Portion of the $20 billion paid to KBR that Pentagon auditors deem "questionable or supportable" - $3.2 billion&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Number of major U.S. bases in Iraq - 75 (The Nation/New York Times)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;a &lt;a href="http://href=%22http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/26/AR2009032602135.html?hpid=topnews%22%3Egtonpost.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://href=%22http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/26/AR2009032602135.html?hpid=topnews%22%3Egtonpost.com"&gt;href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/cont...&lt;/a&gt;  &amp;gt; Nation&lt;br&gt;Obama Plans More Funding For Afghan War&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Obama&amp;amp;#39s new Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy will require significantly higher levels of U.S. funding for both countries, with U.S. military expenses in Afghanistan alone, currently about $2 billion a month, increasing by about 60 percent this year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There go a least 160 billion being poured down the drain...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Quijote</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now the question becomes:  Why would anyone invest in the private sector. The future level of taxes will make many investments unviable.  The looming health, energy, environment, employment, and finance regulations make so many segements of the economy uncertain and too risky to warrant investment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, the proposed healthcare regulations will add to the deficit and based upon past government performance, they costs will be much higher than estimated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">superdestroyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:32:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12628091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DQ -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, The Messiah and His Glorious Programs have nothing to do with the financial problems. It is The Great Satan BushCheney still at work, corrupting the Good Works for His People, who in his Benevolence, He is trying to save.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Great Leader is working diligently for you, fighting the Evil Capitalists who exploit His People. He brings only Good News and Tidings; his enemies bring only destruction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All hail the God-King Obama!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;btw - We are still running under last year's budget, so nothing has changed vis-a-vis how the war effort is being funded, or its impact on the budget, so the whole argument is a red herring.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:18:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12623524</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;BS. The war is winding down (supposedly), and why would it suddenly cost SO much more?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's not costing more, it's just that this year it is not an off-budget item...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://usliberals.about.com/od/homelandsecurit1/a/IraqNumbers.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://usliberals.about.com/od/homelandsecurit1/a/IraqNumbers.htm"&gt;Iraq War Facts, Results &amp;amp; Statistics at June 24, 2009&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;U.S. SPENDING IN IRAQ&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spent &amp;amp; Approved War-Spending - About $800 billion of US taxpayers' funds spent or approved for spending through mid-2009, including $76 billion requested by President Obama and approved by the House.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;U.S. Monthly Spending in Iraq - $12 billion in 2008&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;U.S. Spending per Second - $5,000 in 2008 (per Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on May 5, 2008)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cost of deploying one U.S. soldier for one year in Iraq - $390,000 (Congressional Research Service)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lost &amp;amp; Unaccounted for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers' money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractors. Also, per ABC News, 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47 rifles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Missing - $1 billion in tractor trailers, tank recovery vehicles, machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and other equipment and services provided to the Iraqi security forces. (Per CBS News on Dec 6, 2007.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mismanaged &amp;amp; Wasted in Iraq - $10 billion, per Feb 2007 Congressional hearings&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Halliburton Overcharges Classified by the Pentagon as Unreasonable and Unsupported - $1.4 billion&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Amount paid to KBR, a former Halliburton division, to supply U.S. military in Iraq with food, fuel, housing and other items - $20 billion&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Portion of the $20 billion paid to KBR that Pentagon auditors deem "questionable or supportable" - $3.2 billion&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Number of major U.S. bases in Iraq - 75 (The Nation/New York Times)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/26/AR2009032602135.html?hpid=topnews" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/26/AR2009032602135.html?hpid=topnews"&gt;Obama Plans More Funding For Afghan War&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Obama's new Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy will require significantly higher levels of U.S. funding for both countries, with U.S. military expenses in Afghanistan alone, currently about $2 billion a month, increasing by about 60 percent this year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There go a least 160 billion being poured down the drain...&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Quijote</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12622663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now the question becomes:  Why would anyone invest in the private sector. The future level of taxes will make many investments unviable.  The looming health, energy, environment, employment, and finance regulations make so many segements of the economy uncertain and too risky to warrant investment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, the proposed healthcare regulations will add to the deficit and based upon past government performance, they costs will be much higher than estimated. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">superdestroyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:32:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ron -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BS. The war is winding down (supposedly), and why would it suddenly cost SO much more?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Answer. It does not. The Chosen One has played all his supporters for fools, fiscally. And you are all now left making excuses for his and Congress profligate spending making things worse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Much worse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:36:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Republican Fiscal Policies...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Quijote</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unwinnable Wars&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ron Beasley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Universal health care.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dr_J</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:41:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-1653131319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tip-off...frightening thought that I and my children will be paying that off....or paying for it at least....Was explaining to my 9 year old that we borrow more than we generate as a country, and defining defecit for him. He asked, Mom...What comes after trillion? I said, I dont want to know, and neither do you...He thought for a moment and realized that he would never run his own finances that way. Out of the mouths of babes, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I promised my son that I would ask, who knows what comes after trillion????   Anyone?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anastasia Beaverhausen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:59:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12616077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ron -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BS. The war is winding down (supposedly), and why would it suddenly cost SO much more?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Answer. It does not. The Chosen One has played all his supporters for fools, fiscally. And you are all now left making excuses for his and Congress profligate spending making things worse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Much worse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:36:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12616060</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Republican Fiscal Policies...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Quijote</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12615110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unwinnable Wars&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ron Beasley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12614907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Universal health care.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gootmud</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:41:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Deficit Tops $1 Trillion For The First Time Ever</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39183/federal-deficit-tops-1-trillion-for-the-first-time-ever/#comment-12613787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tip-off...frightening thought that I and my children will be paying that off....or paying for it at least....Was explaining to my 9 year old that we borrow more than we generate as a country, and defining defecit for him. He asked, Mom...What comes after trillion? I said, I dont want to know, and neither do you...He thought for a moment and realized that he would never run his own finances that way. Out of the mouths of babes, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I promised my son that I would ask, who knows what comes after trillion????   Anyone?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anastasia Beaverhausen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:59:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>