-
Website
http://themoderatevoice.com/ -
Original page
http://themoderatevoice.com/51225/irans-reversal-why-isnt-this-story-getting-more-play/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
superdestroyer
1866 comments · 63 points
-
kathykattenburg
2043 comments · 1201 points
-
runasim
1626 comments · 143 points
-
GeorgeSorwell
1854 comments · 660 points
-
Father_Time
1422 comments · 455 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
You Thought 2009 Was Bad?
21 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Are Vegetarians And Vegans Biased Against Plants?
1 day ago · 31 comments
-
Do Voters Owe Obama an Apology?
23 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Health Care Reform: Now the Real Fun Begins
1 day ago · 17 comments
-
Mexico City Legalizes Same Sex Marriage
3 days ago · 71 comments
-
You Thought 2009 Was Bad?
The EU is not the UN. You realize that right?
Of course it isn't. The EU is even less democratic and transparent than the UN. The UN exists to allow third-world countries to enrich and enable their corrupt governments; the EU exists to restore the aristocracy to the rule of Europe.
Wow! Get out of Oklahoma much?
The EU has something the UN doesn't. Leverage against Iran.
Do you have a clue about US geography? AustinRoth. Duh.
I'm quite certain that their work will culminate with an Iranian nuclear missle. Diplomacy hasn't worked well for Europe for the last 80 years or so.
1. There may be more important domestic issues, as with how Afghanistan rates against these issues.
2. The reversal doesn't fit in with the happy ending the lib establishment anticipates or expects with Iran.
3. There are idosyncracies and preferences, colored by trends or a group (herd) mentality about favorite topics of the moment or of the day, just as there are on this Web site. There has been no thread yet here about the Congressional ethics investigations, or about Rattner's remarks about General Motors's management (and the secondary story about the question of self-aggrandizement by Rattner himself), or the alarming proposal to create new dictatorial powers over financial firms (including explicit takeover details), which Mikkel is planning to write about, admittedly.
Plus, it doesn't fit the meme of Nobel Prize winning President reduces World Nuclear Threat. They don't want to print "Nobel Prize winning President gets punked by Iran - AGAIN!"
Horsey didn't fail to notice this:
http://www.seattlepi.com/horsey/viewbydate.asp?...
Nor this...
(Peter, Paul, and Mary? No, Harry, Nance, and Barry.)
http://www.seattlepi.com/horsey/viewbydate.asp?...
Wherever has the Committee been? Especially with the UN General Assembly? ($1 million, each and all!)
Anyway, I agree with Austin's original comment: No one expect Iran to actually agree to anything. When they truly follow through with a promise, that'll be news.
The bigger story on this might not be the Iranian oligarchy reneging, but the fact that the Iranian negotiators don't appear to actually have sufficient power to negotiate. If the deals they cut are ignored, it will become worthless to negotiate with them. It's similar to the trouble that U.S. administrations have on many trade deals. The executive negotiates, but the legislature decides. Makes it harder to negotiate with us.
"Why isn't the fact that Israel has 200 nuclear warheads"
Israel is a responsible, trustworthy nation, unlike its scumbag enemies. There's an obvious difference!