<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moderate Voice - Latest Comments in Mixed Doubles for the White House</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/mixed_doubles_for_the_white_house/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:05:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mixed Doubles for the White House</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/society/family/17527/mixed-doubles-for-the-white-house/#comment-122032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great idea. I can see this happening on Charlie Rose. Sort of a demonstration of patient dialogue among mutually respectful adversaries who share the same aims while favoring slightly different methods.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulSilver</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:05:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>