<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moderate Voice - Latest Comments in NY Post Offensive Headline about Shaking Babies  (Guest Voice)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/ny_post_offensive_headline_about_shaking_babies_guest_voice/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:45:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NY Post Offensive Headline about Shaking Babies  (Guest Voice)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25634/ny-post-offensive-headline-about-shaking-babies-guest-voice/#comment-1653083784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;JSpencer, you have true wit&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe, the issue exists across the board with any group trying to bring focus to unspeakable harms. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The jingle-like writing of silly puns in headlines that I believe began with &amp;amp;#39free presses&amp;amp;#39 like The Seattle Times, Westword, etc., and then copped by some large newspapers, perhaps is not the issue: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can see a headline on this particular subject being &amp;amp;#39SHaken but not stirred... How the Legislature Ignores Infant Trauma,&amp;amp;#39 for instance. I am not sure that it&amp;amp;#39s the pun exactly, but the poverty of the punner&amp;amp;#39s ability &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;dr.e&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">archangel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:45:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY Post Offensive Headline about Shaking Babies  (Guest Voice)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25634/ny-post-offensive-headline-about-shaking-babies-guest-voice/#comment-5149030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;JSpencer, you have true wit&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Joe, the issue exists across the board with any group trying to bring focus to unspeakable harms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The jingle-like writing of silly puns in headlines that I believe began with 'free presses' like The Seattle Times, Westword, etc., and then copped by some large newspapers, perhaps is not the issue:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can see a headline on this particular subject being 'SHaken but not stirred... How the Legislature Ignores Infant Trauma,' for instance. I am not sure that it's the pun exactly, but the poverty of the punner's ability&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;dr.e&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">archangel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:45:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY Post Offensive Headline about Shaking Babies  (Guest Voice)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25634/ny-post-offensive-headline-about-shaking-babies-guest-voice/#comment-1653083785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the person who chose the headline (yes, it was in shockingly inappropriate) was shaken too much as an infant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JSpencer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY Post Offensive Headline about Shaking Babies  (Guest Voice)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25634/ny-post-offensive-headline-about-shaking-babies-guest-voice/#comment-5138516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the person who chose the headline (yes, it was shockingly inappropriate) was shaken too much as an infant. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JSpencer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>