-
Website
http://themoderatevoice.com/ -
Original page
http://themoderatevoice.com/38300/rep-peter-king-r-ny-michael-jackson-a-pervert-pedophile/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
superdestroyer
1859 comments · 63 points
-
kathykattenburg
1943 comments · 1152 points
-
runasim
1626 comments · 143 points
-
GeorgeSorwell
1840 comments · 643 points
-
Father_Time
1381 comments · 448 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Healthcare Enters Take It Or Leave It Stage
11 hours ago · 15 comments
-
Nelson to Support Health Care Reform; Summary of Reid’s Newest Amendment; States Get Power to Limit Abortion Coverage
15 hours ago · 20 comments
-
Bratwurst! Massive Healthcare Victory for Dems
3 hours ago · 4 comments
-
Howard Dean’s Bombshell
3 days ago · 108 comments
-
Sen. Joe Lieberman, the “Point Man”
19 hours ago · 15 comments
-
Healthcare Enters Take It Or Leave It Stage
Peter King has already gotten more attention for this than he has for anything he ever accomplished as an elected official.
You live in a reality of which I have no familiarity.
And I, and a congressman, or anyone, has the right to express those opinions, or state that they beleive that those to be facts.
Just like not all guilty verdicts are for people who committed the crime. Any objections against those who state as a fact that some person 'X' is in fact innocent of a crime 'Y' they were found guilty of? Or is this a one way street in your mind?
And I don't believe OJ is innocent; that the LAPD was innocent of beating Rodney King; that Robert Blake was innocent; that William Kennedy Smith didn't rape anyone; etc.
Peedie Weedie (Congressman King) did not say "I believe," he stated it as a fact instead of an opinion.
That clear it up for you?
And DLS, I'd be interested in a discussion about Robert McNamara too. I wonder how comfortably he's resting where he is now? I suppose that question assumes some kind of judgemental hereafter, which I have serious doubts about, but I was using it mainly as a figure of speech.
See for Peter King and most conservatives its not about whats right or whats best for America, its about what best for Peter King; in this case white Irish man.
That all you need to know about the man.
~ L
Douche bag…
Please do not forget Mr.King the good Michael did during his life, not only the talent he shared with all of us for so many years, but all of the charitable and humanitarian work he did. Your comments are hateful and show deep rooted anger. I bet we wouldn't have to dig too deep to uncover your faults or people's "perceived" thoughts about your shortcomings.
You could benefit from the gentle and loving spirit that Michael had. I am glad you do not represent my area. You should be ashamed, I'm sure your district is.
ROTFLMAO@Libero
Parents trust me with their kids everyday in my job. I have been trusted with hundreds of them without any a single incident , accusation, or suspicion whatsoever. You see I don't hold sleepovers with little boys or do other suspicious activities. If you would have trusted your children with Jacko, well, thats up to you, most people have more sense when it comes to their kids.
I'm not saying Jackson was guilty, but I am saying that his behavior was suspect, and not many parents would want their kids hanging out unsupervised with a guy who had been taken to court on child molestation charges.
I think it depends on how informed the parents are. I would not trust my children with you, because believe me, if you continue to be around hundreds of children your turn to be accused is not far off. In addition, I am of the opinion that you need to feel what it's like to be falsely accused, and especially of such a terrible thing as child molestation.
Peter King is no more than a pathetically self serving politician with limited potential.
Don't know if he was actually a pervert and a pedaphile, but I don't know anyone who would trust him with their kids on a sleepover.
What's worse than anyone who has misgivings about Jackson's being too close with the kiddies is the celeb-style obscession we've seen with Jackson (and Palin and Sanford) rather than current _real_ newsmakers like the late Steve McNair (far from a role model; a subject once more for the gun control debate), or Lance Armstrong (in the Tour de France) or President Obama and his "counterpart" (bearing in mind the strings pulled by Putin) Medvedev in Russia (implications not only for nuclear arms reduction and the fate of the European NATO missile shield, but for Russian involvement in Iran's nuclear program).
Oh, and don't forget the fun and games in Honduras and the threats Chavez had made to interfere there.
[shrug] They certainly have rushed away from "their" Iranian revolution they "adopted" to go back to their obscession with attacking Sanford and the Palins in no time. If anything, it is set to increase after Jacko is buried, unless another object of their -- rabid wrath -- materializes between now and then.
I am awfully sick and tired of all this idol worship over a washed-up pedophile. Good riddance to bad rubbish, I say - I'm avoiding the news channels until all this pedophile-lovefest is over.
Our consulation is that he will go to HELL for the sick way he played out his life and was able to pay for his inocenct verdict. America , you have a lot to answer too. Garry.
Has anyone made a thread praising Michael Bloomberg's giving?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/nyregion/27bl...
Probably just fine, especially when he made his grand admission he was wrong and an apology first.
* * *
As to King's comments, well, the memorial service was surprisingly good and not marred too much by defensive remarks about Jackson's foibles (which had no place in that memorial at all, incidentally), so King got his comeuppance in both the form of the remarks as well as how the memorial was received.
I agree that the media has taken this too far, and that not enough credit is given to those who have healing effects on the people around them. In my Heart I feel that Micheal WAS indeed a very wounded person who had sexuality problems - that he was guilty of inappropriate behaviors with children. (I'd had a vision which told me this) But it is not fair for us to judge him, label him or put him down. We all have our own kinds of issues. And Micheal's issues were also "too publicised". Perhaps more healing could have taken place in him if he'd had less mud thrown at him and more realizations of his inner woundedness and the need for help and healing from his abusive childhood. Micheal was a wounded child and a great artist who lead a sad life. Perhaps there is something we can learn from the intrusions the media has invaded his life with. Perhaps the media's greed for stories is the real issue here.
*