<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moderate Voice - Latest Comments in Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/thumbing_its_nose_at_europe/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:45:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-1653130839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DLS, we NEED regulation of the oil market. If it were supply and demand, as we were told, that&amp;amp;#39s one thing. But it&amp;amp;#39s not. Prices of a critical commodity were manipulated to the detriment of the general public. That is not a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreenDreams</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:45:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-1653130845</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And for correction #2:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;" If the Journal wants to editorialize about energy policy in UK and France, it should publish an editorial, not hijack a column."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not is it not hijacking a column, it&amp;amp;#39s accurately titled opinion of the Europeans was on the _opinion_ page, as opposed to the practice in so many other, liberally-biased (both terms apply) newspapers of doing this in the "news" section.  (I could add practices like relegating Congressional activity on a balanced budget amendment in the 1990s to a remote page of the Business section rather than on page one of the main news section -- and so I&amp;amp;#39ll add that, as another example of what others, rather than the Journal, do.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DLS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-1653130837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;amp;#39s not vague (grunt omitted).  Obviously what&amp;amp;#39s being advocated is interventionism in the oil market.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DLS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:36:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-12466130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DLS, we NEED regulation of the oil market. If it were supply and demand, as we were told, that's one thing. But it's not. Prices of a critical commodity were manipulated to the detriment of the general public. That is not a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreenDreams</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:45:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-12451358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And for correction #2:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;" If the Journal wants to editorialize about energy policy in UK and France, it should publish an editorial, not hijack a column."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not is it not hijacking a column, it's accurately titled opinion of the Europeans was on the _opinion_ page, as opposed to the practice in so many other, liberally-biased (both terms apply) newspapers of doing this in the "news" section.  (I could add practices like relegating Congressional activity on a balanced budget amendment in the 1990s to a remote page of the Business section rather than on page one of the main news section -- and so I'll add that, as another example of what others, rather than the Journal, do.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DLS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-12450707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not vague (grunt omitted).  Obviously what's being advocated is interventionism in the oil market.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DLS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:36:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-1653130838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why shouldn&amp;amp;#39t the market and supply and demand unfettered by government interference, be allowed to run free? Because this happens:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what caused the huge spike in oil prices? Take a wild guess. Obviously Goldman had help — there were other players in the physical-commodities market — but the root cause had almost everything to do with the behavior of a few powerful actors determined to turn the once-solid market into a speculative casino. Goldman did it by persuading pension funds and other large institutional investors to invest in oil futures — agreeing to buy oil at a certain price on a fixed date. The push transformed oil from a physical commodity, rigidly subject to supply and demand, into something to bet on, like a stock. Between 2003 and 2008, the amount of speculative money in commodities grew from $13 billion to $317 billion, an increase of 2,300 percent. By 2008, a barrel of oil was traded 27 times, on average, before it was actually delivered and consumed.&lt;br&gt;Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone. "The Bubble Machine"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreenDreams</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:34:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-1653130836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes well the more government take-overs the better IMO. Lets start with healthcare here in America please.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&amp;amp;#39s a shame we will not get Justice with public senior exec beheadings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Father_Time</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-12415688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why shouldn't the market and supply and demand unfettered by government interference, be allowed to run free? Because this happens:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And what caused the huge spike in oil prices? Take a wild guess. Obviously Goldman had help — there were other players in the physical-commodities market — but the root cause had almost everything to do with the behavior of a few powerful actors determined to turn the once-solid market into a speculative casino. Goldman did it by persuading pension funds and other large institutional investors to invest in oil futures — agreeing to buy oil at a certain price on a fixed date. The push transformed oil from a physical commodity, rigidly subject to supply and demand, into something to bet on, like a stock. Between 2003 and 2008, the amount of speculative money in commodities grew from $13 billion to $317 billion, an increase of 2,300 percent. By 2008, a barrel of oil was traded 27 times, on average, before it was actually delivered and consumed.&lt;br&gt;Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone. "The Bubble Machine"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreenDreams</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:34:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thumbing its nose at Europe</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38762/thumbing-its-nose-at-europe/#comment-12414029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes well the more government take-overs the better IMO. Lets start with healthcare here in America please.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's a shame we will not get Justice with public senior exec beheadings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Father_Time</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>